3
  Home Page ::   Latest News & Events :: Monthly Newsletter :: Office Bearers ::  Contact Us  
 
Latest Circulars
 
Previous Circulars
 
Search AIRRBOF.ORG
 
Credit Information Review
 
Supreme Court Verdict
Send your suggestions
and queries to
info
@airrbof.org

 

 

 

 

 

Vol - XV      No. 5     SILIGURI                 MAY, 2008

Editorial

SIXTH PAY PANEL FOR CENTRAL GOVERNMENT STAFFER -

PAY & PENSION BONANZA FOR ALL

The Sixth Central Pay Panel headed by Shri B.N. Srikrishna submitted its report to the Union Government on 24th March, 2008.

The panel recommended an overall increase ranging between 23% to 58% in various categories. The increase in salary, without taking into account allowances, is low at lower levels, high at the highest levels, but at the highest levels, working at the Centre

Editorial Board:

i) Com. S.K. Bhattacharjee -     

  Editor in Chief.

ii) Com. Swapan Sarkar - Editor.

iii) Com. B.P. Singh.

iv) Com. S.K. Pal.

v)  Com. C. Jayakumar.

vi) Com. Rajesh Kori.

vii) Com. B.K. Mukhopadhaya.

Single Copy -   Rs. 5.00

Annual        -   Rs. 50.00

Life             -   Rs. 500.00

All India Regional Rural Bank Officers' Federation.

“JGGP HOUSE”

Raja Rammohan Road

Near Employment Exchange Office, Hakimpara,

SILIGURI - 734001

Printed  at:

Manju Printers,

Siliguri.

VISIT US AT

www.airrbof.org

will entail for going significant amounts of salary available at the state level. And within each Pay Band, the higher you go, the lower the effective hike in salary. In a special move towards women employees, the commission has recommended benefits like staggered working hours, special leave provision for child care, enhancing maternity leave to 180 days and better accommodation facilities like working women's hostels.

The increase in pension for the retired employees of the Central Government is also substantial. The increase ranges from 20% to 40% with most of the retired employees enjoying a pension packet 40% heftier than the earlier months. Similarly family pension would also go up. The family pension for those retired employees who are 80 years or more shall be more lucrative.

Indian Railways is one of the major employer under the Central Government. The Railways have kept aside in its budget proposal Rs. 7000 crs. This amount may be not sufficient to cater to the need of the pay hike for its employees. It was told by Chairman, Parliamentary Committee on Railways that the burden of the Pay Commission recommendations shall push operating ratio of Indian Railways further up.

One of the beneficiaries of the hike in the salary and allowances of the Central Govt. staffers shall be the Income Tax Dept. According to the former Chairman of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) T.N. Pandey, the recommendations would definitely bring more people under tax net and many would also have a higher tax liability.

(2)

One of the major fallout of the implementation of salary hike for the Central Govt. staff would be on the finances of the State Govt. to provide the benefit of Salary Revision to their staff. According to the Pay Panel higher tax revenues in the coming years and strong financials will help most of the State Govt.s meet the enhanced pay bill as and when they implement Sixth Pay Commission recommendation. It was also held by the Panel that the States which do not reflect comfortable position as far as increased expenditure is concerned may decide on a date of implementation different from centre and stagger the payment of arrears suitably.

The response to the recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission varies amongst the different Trade Unions of the employees and officers. A section held that only a handful of superior officers will corner the benefit while employees at the lower cadre were completely ignored. In a bid to get a minimum entry level salary of Rs. 10,000 certain Trade Unions are planning to meet the Prime Minister and the Union Finance Minister. However, some Trade Unions with commanding membership welcomed the recommendation of the pay panel.

With the Central Govt. staffers getting a good Salary Revision the employees and officers in the Banking Industry are keeping their fingers crossed about the likely Salary Revision in the Industry with IBA playing truant.

AIRRBOF NEWS LETTER EXCLUSIVE

REPORT OF COMMITTEE TO FORMULATE

A COMPREHENSIVE HUMAN RESOURCE POLICY FOR RRBs

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OCTOBER 2007

Executive Summary

CONTINUED FROM THE EARLIER ISSUE

 Table 8.4

Staffing Pattern in Controlling Office (CO)

Designation

Staffing Pattern (Indicative)

Officers-in-Charge (OIC)

1*

Officers in Scale I / II / III

5

Officers Sub-Total

6

Clerks

4

Sub Staff

2

Total

12

 * In CO, OIC will be headed by an officer one scale below GM.

Similarly the position of officers could be Scale I or II or III depending upon the need of the RRB.  

(3)

Table No.8.5

Staffing Pattern for Branches (Indicative)

Branch Category

A

B

C

D

E

Business level(Rs.Cr)

Up to 4

4-6

6-10

10-15

15-20

20-25

25-30

30-40

40-50

50-75

75-100

Above 100

Designation

Scale V

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Scale IV

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

Scale III

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

Scale II

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

2

3

3

3

4

Scale I

1

2

1

1

2

2

3

2

2

2

3

4

Sub Total

(Officer)

1

2

2

2

3

4

5

5

6

7

8

12

Clerks

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

4

4

4

Sub staff

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

3

Grand Total

3

4

5

5

6

7

8

9

10

12

14

19

Calculation of Aggregate Staffing Pattern in RRBs

The Total staff requirement (ceiling) for a RRB will be as under:-

1

(a)  Aggregate staff requirement of branches as per business level (deposits + advances) as indicated in the table no.8.5

A

(b)  In respect of Satellite branches / Extension Counter, separate manpower norm of one officer  + one Clerk per unit

B

2

Aggregate staff requirement of CO as per table no.8.4

C

3

Staff requirement of HO as per table no.8.3

D

4

Inspecting officers @ 1 officer in Scale II/III for every 25 branches

E

Sub Total- A + B + C + D + E

F

5

Additional not exceeding 2.5% of X (sub-total) to meet need based staff requirements at branches, on case to case basis, to meet opportunities / challenges for other business, NPAs, etc. (subject to approval of Sponsor Bank)

G

Grand Total (Overall Ceiling of staff for the RRB) F + G

H

Note:  

1. Total staff in HO & CO excluding inspection officials shall not exceed 8% of total staff in the RRB, minimum being 08 staff.

2. As regards actual deployment of officers & staff in HO, CO and branches, RRB may decide within the overall ceiling with the approval of the Board.

3. For extending business outreach covering Financial Inclusion, recoveries, business development, etc. (for non-core activities as defined by RBI) Business correspondents and outside people engaged for monitoring such business will be contractual engagement and will not form part of staff ceiling prescribed for RRBs.  For which RRBs shall have a policy duly approved by their Board.

(4)

With the above assessment, (except at G) category-wise and grade wise deficit & surplus as on 31st March 2007 have been worked out as under:

Table No.8.6

Deficit/Surplus of staff in RRBs based on proposed norms

(Position as on 31.3.07)

Particulars

Officers in Scale

Group B

Group C

Grand Total

V

IV

III

II

I

Total

A)Staff requirement as per norms recommended by present Committee for the system as a whole

58

485

1501

10102

19442

31588

18966

14325

64879

B) Existing staff

0

0

1563

9407

17017

27987

21693

13575

63255

C)  Deficit (-)      

   /Surplus (+)

(-)58

(-)485

(+)62

(-)

695

(-)

2425

(-)

3601

(+)2727

(-)750

(-)

1624

Based on Provisional data submitted by 82 out of 96 RRBs.

Considering that movement of staff in RRB with excess staff not taking place to RRBs with deficit staff, the additional requirement will be 4546 staff entailing an expected additional financial burden of Rs. 68.20 crore on the 62 RRBs as a whole. The requirement and promotional exercise should be phased out and completed by 2009. The assessment of staff in a dynamic situation as on 31st March 2011 will be as follows:

Table No.8.7

Deficit / Surplus of Staff as per proposed norm

Particulars

Officers in Scale

Group B

Group C

Grand Total

V

IV

III

II

I

Total

A) Staff requirement as per norms recommended for the system as a whole

102

790

3924

15446

22706

41729

24475

14465

81908

B) Existing staff

0

0

1563

9407

17017

27987

21693

13575

63255

Deficit (-)

/Surplus (+)

(-)102

(-)790

(-)2361

(-)6039

(-)5689

(-)

14981

(-)2782

(-)890

(-)

18653

(5)

The ratio of staff in Group A (officers), Group B and Group C (Sub-staff) as per norms as on 31st March 2007 and 31st March 2011 with reference to existing ratio as on 31st March 2007 are furnished below:

Table 8.8

Category of Staff

Existing Ratio

(as on 31.3.07)

Based on norms as recommended by the Committee (As on)

31.03.2007

31.03.2011

31.03.2015

Group A

44.25

48.69

52.04

59.79

Group B